Littell v. Taishoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Littell v. Taishoff

22 A.D.2d 866, 254 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2624

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 866 (Littell v. Taishoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Littell v. Taishoff, 22 A.D.2d 866, 254 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered May 27, 1964, modifying defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the demand as to items 1 to 9, inclusive, 18 and 19, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $30 costs' and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant. In the main the above items refer or are related to matters of record or admitted in the pleadings. The few remaining items are too insignificant to warrant the judicial effort required to isolate them from the numerous unwarranted demands. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered May 27, 1964, modifying defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the demand as to items 1 to 9, inclusive, 18 and 19, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $30 costs' and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant. In the main the above items refer or are related to matters of record or admitted in the pleadings. The few remaining items are too insignificant to warrant the judicial effort required to isolate them from the numerous unwarranted demands. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 866, 254 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littell-v-taishoff-nyappdiv-1964.