Littell v. M'Iver
This text of 4 Ky. 203 (Littell v. M'Iver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION of the Court, by
— .It is unnecessary for the court to decide, what relief the appellant might have been entitled to, or whether his case if it had been legally supported, would have justified the interposition of a court of equity at all; the case as stated in the bill, is clearly and explicitly denied by the answer, which is only attempted to be disproved by the oath of a solitary witness. This has been uniformly deemed insufficient, to countervail an answer in such cases; but in this case the answer itself is corroborated by a witness who was present at the transaction alluded to, and who appears to have had an equal opportunity with the complainant’s witness, of knowing what conversation did take place between the parties..
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ky. 203, 1 Bibb 203, 1808 Ky. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littell-v-miver-kyctapp-1808.