Litowitz v. Litowitz
596 So. 2d 169, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404, 1992 WL 73535
This text of 596 So. 2d 169 (Litowitz v. Litowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Litowitz v. Litowitz, 596 So. 2d 169, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404, 1992 WL 73535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Boylan v. Boylan, 571 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Nisbeth v. Nisbeth, 568 So.2d 461 (Fla.3d DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nisbeth v. Nisbeth
568 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Boylan v. Boylan
571 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
596 So. 2d 169, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404, 1992 WL 73535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litowitz-v-litowitz-fladistctapp-1992.