Litman v. Weaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Litman v. Weaver

10 A.D.2d 865, 201 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 865 (Litman v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Litman v. Weaver, 10 A.D.2d 865, 201 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In two proceedings to review orders of the respondent State Rent Administrator, which denied protests with respect to orders of the Local Rent Administrator, which granted increases in rents on the basis of hardship, under subdivision 4 of section 4 of the State Residential Rent Law' (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.), the tenants appeal from the orders dismissing the petitions on the merits. The [866]*866appeals have been consolidated. Appellants contend (1) that respondent’s practice of allowing as operating expenses the landlord’s legal expenses in prosecuting the rent increase applications, is unauthorized and void; and (2) that respondent improperly refused to allow appellants to make an examination of the landlord’s books and records. Orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two proceedings to review orders of the respondent State Rent Administrator, which denied protests with respect to orders of the Local Rent Administrator, which granted increases in rents on the basis of hardship, under subdivision 4 of section 4 of the State Residential Rent Law' (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.), the tenants appeal from the orders dismissing the petitions on the merits. The [866]*866appeals have been consolidated. Appellants contend (1) that respondent’s practice of allowing as operating expenses the landlord’s legal expenses in prosecuting the rent increase applications, is unauthorized and void; and (2) that respondent improperly refused to allow appellants to make an examination of the landlord’s books and records. Orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 865, 201 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litman-v-weaver-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack