Lithun v. DuPaul
This text of 525 N.W.2d 252 (Lithun v. DuPaul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael DuPauI appeals from a judgment severely restricting his visitation. He alleges that the court violated his constitutional rights by the restrictions it imposed. Given the facts, however, authority does not support his claims. Dschaak v. Dschaak, 479 N.W.2d 484 (N.D.1992); Lithun v. DuPaul, 449 N.W.2d 810 (N.D.1989); Lithun v. DuPaul, 447 N.W.2d 297 (N.D.1989); C.B.D. v. W.E.B., 298 N.W.2d 493 (N.D.1980). We summarily affirm the district court’s ruling pursuant to NDRAppP 35.1(a)(2) and (7).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 N.W.2d 252, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 274, 1994 WL 722112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lithun-v-dupaul-nd-1994.