Lit-Ning Products, Inc.

553 F.2d 104, 23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,927, 212 Ct. Cl. 577, 1977 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 135
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 5, 1977
DocketNo. 160-75
StatusPublished

This text of 553 F.2d 104 (Lit-Ning Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lit-Ning Products, Inc., 553 F.2d 104, 23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,927, 212 Ct. Cl. 577, 1977 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 135 (cc 1977).

Opinion

Contracts; default termination for delay; accord and satisfaction; failure to exhaust administrative remedies.— Plaintiff seeks Wunderlich Act review of three decisions of the General Services Board of Contract Appeals, one affirming the default termination of plaintiff’s contract to supply metal wastebaskets, one on reconsideration, and one on assessment of excess reprocurement costs, and seeks damages for the financial consequences of an allegedly improper fire test which is said to have temporarily prohibited further production and eventually contract termination for default in delivery. Defendant, in its cross-motion for summary judgment, justifies the default termination, relies on a defense of accord and satisfaction, and counterclaims for excess reproourement costs, alleging a now binding election by plaintiff during administrative stages not to contest the amount of the award for excess reprocurement costs. On May 19, 1976 Trial Judge C. Murray Bernhardt filed a recommended decision (reported in full at 22 CCF para. 80311) agreeing with the Board’s legal conclusion that plaintiff’s claim is barred by accord and satisfaction, and further finding that plaintiff is barred from recovering for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and on the factual basis of the causes of the delay, and that the Board’s assessment of excess reprocurement costs is amply supported by the record. This case came before the court on plaintiff’s request for review by the court of the said recommended decision. On January 5, 1977 the court affirmed and adopted the said decision as the basis for its judgment in this case, dismissed the petition, and entered judgment for defendant on its counterclaim in the sum of $17,895.28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 F.2d 104, 23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,927, 212 Ct. Cl. 577, 1977 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lit-ning-products-inc-cc-1977.