Lit Bros. v. Hare

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Lit Bros. v. Hare

69 Pa. Super. 372, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 22, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 274·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The liability of a husband for purchases made by his wife for necessaries for her support and maintenance, has been so recently considered in Hagedorn v. Haber, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 179; Strawbridge v. Wolff, 66 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, and Gaston v. Vitte, 67 Pa. Superior Ct. 483, that it is not requisite in this case to repeat the reasons and citations therein given.

The disputed facts in this case were fairly submitted by the trial judge and there is sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict returned by the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The liability of a husband for purchases made by his wife for necessaries for her support and maintenance, has been so recently considered in Hagedorn v. Haber, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 179; Strawbridge v. Wolff, 66 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, and Gaston v. Vitte, 67 Pa. Superior Ct. 483, that it is not requisite in this case to repeat the reasons and citations therein given.

The disputed facts in this case were fairly submitted by the trial judge and there is sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict returned by the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Lit Bros. v. Hare, 69 Pa. Super. 372, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

69 Pa. Super. 372 (Lit Bros. v. Hare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related