Lit Bros. v. Hare

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Lit Bros. v. Hare

69 Pa. Super. 372, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 22, 1918

DocketAppeal, No. 274

StatusPublished

This text of 69 Pa. Super. 372 (Lit Bros. v. Hare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lit Bros. v. Hare, 69 Pa. Super. 372, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The liability of a husband for purchases made by his wife for necessaries for her support and maintenance, has been so recently considered in Hagedorn v. Haber, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 179; Strawbridge v. Wolff, 66 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, and Gaston v. Vitte, 67 Pa. Superior Ct. 483, that it is not requisite in this case to repeat the reasons and citations therein given.

The disputed facts in this case were fairly submitted by the trial judge and there is sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict returned by the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI