Liston v. Lake Park Bank
This text of 97 S.E. 106 (Liston v. Lake Park Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error' raises simply the question whether the evidence authorized the verdict. Where there is some evidence authorizing the verdict and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, this court is powerless to interfere, and rightly so. The jury and the trial judge have the advantage of seeing as well as hearing the witnesses testify, and are in better position to credit or disbelieve testimony when they are so situated. We can not say that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.E. 106, 22 Ga. App. 680, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liston-v-lake-park-bank-gactapp-1918.