Lister v. Williams
1911 OK 38, 114 P. 255, 28 Okla. 302, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 92
Opinion
The defendant in error has moved the dismissal of this proceeding in error on the grounds that the case-made was signed and settled without proper notice of the time and place of settlement.
The case-made was served upon the defendant in error without any notice of the time and place of the signing and settling of same by the trial judge. No appearance was made, notr were any amendments suggested. The proceeding in error must be dismissed. First National Bank v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383, 108 Pac. 748.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lister v. Williams, 1911 OK 38, 114 P. 255, 28 Okla. 302, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 92 (Okla. 1911).
1911 OK 38 (Lister v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris
1923 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Keenan v. Chastain
1917 OK 266 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Brown v. Marks
1915 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Moore v. Howard Mercantile Co.
1914 OK 123 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Pain v. Wylie
1913 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Flathers v. Flathers
1913 OK 68 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)