Lister v. Snowden
This text of Lister v. Snowden (Lister v. Snowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERI()R COURT ()F THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LoLA LISTER,
Plaintiff,
V. C.A. No. NlSC-l l-025
DON J. SNOWDEN AND COLONIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendants.
June l4, 2017
On Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
Whereas, having reviewed the papers and hearing from counsel regarding Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintifi’s Response thereto, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED. Discovery is closed but Defendants are entitled to their DME. Plaintiff is ordered to attend a DME with Defendants’ medical expert. Defendants Motion for sanctions is hereby GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is to pay $500.00 for the cost of the missed appointments
IT IS SO ORDERED.
M>
JudgewCalvilyl{. SUt, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lister v. Snowden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lister-v-snowden-delsuperct-2017.