Lister v. Lister
57 A. 1132, 66 N.J. Eq. 434, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 197
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery filed in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Jus tice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green — 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lister v. Lister, 57 A. 1132, 66 N.J. Eq. 434, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 197 (N.J. 1904).
57 A. 1132 (Lister v. Lister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Brien v. O'Brien
142 A. 898 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)