Lissner v. Dochtermann

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lissner v. Dochtermann

49 Misc. 624, 97 N.Y.S. 230

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Blanchard, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order amending the judgment in favor of the defendants by striking therefrom the allowance of thirty dollars for costs and disbursements.

The motion for the order appealed from was made more than five days after the judgt ont was rendered and according to section 254 of the Municipal Court Act was too late. Buchbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. Rep. 85.

Scott and Dowling, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanchard, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order amending the judgment in favor of the defendants by striking therefrom the allowance of thirty dollars for costs and disbursements.

The motion for the order appealed from was made more than five days after the judgt ont was rendered and according to section 254 of the Municipal Court Act was too late. Buchbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. Rep. 85.

Scott and Dowling, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant.

Lissner v. Dochtermann, 49 Misc. 624, 97 N.Y.S. 230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

49 Misc. 624 (Lissner v. Dochtermann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related