Liss v. United States
This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 880 (Liss v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of articles in chief value of plastic similar in use and in all material respects to those the subject of Ace Importing Co., Inc. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 468, Abstract 64185) and Ace Importing Co., Inc. v. United States (50 Cust. Ct. 226, Abstract 67488), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 Cust. Ct. 880, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liss-v-united-states-cusc-1967.