Liskamm v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liskamm v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp.

283 A.D. 891, 129 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5663

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 1954·Published

Opinion

Motion to dispense with the printing o£ certain portions of the testimony and to dispense with the printing of exhibits denied, without costs, without prejudice to the renewal of the motion after the settlement of the case on appeal. The case should first be settled pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§§ 575, 576) and the Rules of Civil Practice (rules 230, 232) and in accordance with established practice (Boylan v. Southern Pacific Go., 253 App. Div. 195). Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Mae-Crate and Schmidt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with the printing o£ certain portions of the testimony and to dispense with the printing of exhibits denied, without costs, without prejudice to the renewal of the motion after the settlement of the case on appeal. The case should first be settled pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§§ 575, 576) and the Rules of Civil Practice (rules 230, 232) and in accordance with established practice (Boylan v. Southern Pacific Go., 253 App. Div. 195). Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Mae-Crate and Schmidt, JJ.

Liskamm v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp., 283 A.D. 891, 129 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

283 A.D. 891 (Liskamm v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related