Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lishinsky v. State

Lishinsky v. State

219 So. 3d 89, 2017 WL 626659, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2057
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 2017
DocketNo. 4D15-2531
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 So. 3d 89 (Lishinsky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lishinsky v. State, 219 So. 3d 89, 2017 WL 626659, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2057 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

David Lishinsky appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation in Case Nos. 11-6410CF1QA, 12-668CF10A and 13-10939CF10A. As the State concedes, the probation affidavit is not included in the record on appeal. However, because the transcript of the revocation hearing indicates the possible existence of the probation affidavit, we reverse and remand to the trial court to conduct further proceedings directed at locating and considering the probation affidavit. See Howard v. State, 883 So.2d 879, 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Reversed and Remanded.

Levine, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raimondi v. State
253 So. 3d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 So. 3d 89, 2017 WL 626659, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lishinsky-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.