Lishchiner v. Goldens Bridge Community Ass'n
This text of 281 A.D. 903 (Lishchiner v. Goldens Bridge Community Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an'action to enjoin interference with an express easement to use community property upon payment of a stated maximum sum annually toward the maintenance thereof, the corporate defendants appeal from so much of a judgment entered on the decision of an Official Referee, made after trial, as is in favor of respondents and against said defendants and as dismisses their counterclaim. It is contended that the injunction should have been denied upon the legal ground that the easement is burdened with payment of a proportionate share of the actual costs of maintenance and upon the equitable ground that the granting of the injunction does greater harm than would its withholding. Judgment insofar as appeal is taken unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Beldock, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 903, 120 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lishchiner-v-goldens-bridge-community-assn-nyappdiv-1953.