LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, as ) Personal Representative of the Estate ) of MELISSA STODDARD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2712 ) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ) MACHINES, CORP. d/b/a IBM; ) MICROSOFT CORPORATION; and ) CGI TECHNOLOGIES and ) SOLUTIONS, INC. ) ) Appellees. ) )
Opinion filed October 23, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Lee Dakan, Judge.
Richard A. Filson of Filson & Penge, P.A., Sarasota, and Howard M. Talenfeld of Talenfeld Law, Plantation, for Appellant.
Ricardo A. Gonzalez; Stephanie L. Varela; Julissa Rodriguez; and Brigid F. Cech Samole of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for Appellee Microsoft Corporation.
Hunter G. Norton and Duane A. Daiker of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Sarasota, for Appellee CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc.
Marie A. Borland and David L. Luikart III Of Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, For Appellee International Business Machines Corporation.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisha-thomas-stoddard-as-personal-representative-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.