LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 2019·No. 18-2712·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, as ) Personal Representative of the Estate ) of MELISSA STODDARD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2712 )

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ) MACHINES, CORP. d/b/a IBM; ) MICROSOFT CORPORATION; and ) CGI TECHNOLOGIES and ) SOLUTIONS, INC. )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed October 23, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Lee Dakan, Judge.

Richard A. Filson of Filson & Penge, P.A., Sarasota, and Howard M. Talenfeld of Talenfeld Law, Plantation, for Appellant.

Ricardo A. Gonzalez; Stephanie L. Varela; Julissa Rodriguez; and Brigid F. Cech Samole of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for Appellee Microsoft Corporation.

Hunter G. Norton and Duane A. Daiker of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Sarasota, for Appellee CGI

Technologies and Solutions Inc.

Marie A. Borland and David L. Luikart III Of Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, For Appellee International Business Machines Corporation.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (LISHA THOMAS STODDARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.