Lisenby v. Lindsey
This text of 85 So. 827 (Lisenby v. Lindsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit originated in the justice of the peace court of precinct 6, of Henry county, and from a judgment for plaintiff in that court the defendant appealed to the circuit court. The cause was there tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was again rendered for plaintiff, and appellant appeals to this court, assigning as the only ground of error the rendition of the judgment by the court upon the facts in the case.
It is a familiar rule in this state that the conclusion of a court sitting without a jury, if based upon the oral testimony of witnesses, must on appeal be given the force and effect of a verdict of a jury, and, unless plainly wrong, cannot be disturbed, notwithstanding the statute requires this court to review the conclusions and judgments of the trial court without any presumption in favor of the court below on the evidence.
We have examined the evidence in this ease, which is in sharp conflict. There was ample evidence upon which to base the judgment rendered. There is nothing in the record making it clearly apparent that the court was plainly wrong in its conclusions, and the judgment rendered in the court below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 So. 827, 17 Ala. App. 467, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisenby-v-lindsey-alactapp-1920.