Lisenbee v. Whitman
This text of Lisenbee v. Whitman (Lisenbee v. Whitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CORY LISENBEE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-396
DEAN WHITMAN,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed August 17, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, John Galluzzo, Judge.
Cory Lisenbee, Lake Mary, pro se.
Joseph S. Justice, of Ringer, Henry, Buckley & Seacord, PA, Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly dismissed Appellant’s amended complaint with prejudice.
The applicable statute of limitations had run, and Appellant admittedly failed to comply or
plead compliance with the mandatory presuit investigation and notice requirements set
forth in chapter 766, Florida Statutes.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lisenbee v. Whitman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisenbee-v-whitman-fladistctapp-2018.