Lisenba v. California

Supreme Court

Lisenba v. California

311 U.S. 617, 61 S. Ct. 68

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lisenba v. California. Read the opinion of the Court — 314 U.S. 219 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 28, 1940·No. Nos. 133 and 134·Published

Opinion

Appeals from the Supreme Court of California.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The appeals aré dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs, of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from the Supreme Court of California.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The appeals aré dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs, of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.

Lisenba v. California, 311 U.S. 617, 61 S. Ct. 68 (1940).

Pincite

311 U.S. 617 (Lisenba v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.