Lischko v. MEHLVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

271 S.W.3d 634, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 2008·No. ED 90794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chuck Lischko, Dave Andrews, Dan Ro-senthal, Robert Strinni, James Kornhardt, and Mehlville Fire Fighters Local 1889 (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment in favor of Melville Fire Protection District, Aaron Hilmer, Bonnie Stegman, and Daniel C. Ottoline, Sr. The trial court’s judgment dissolved its preliminary injunction and denied Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lischko v. MEHLVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 271 S.W.3d 634, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

271 S.W.3d 634 (Lischko v. MEHLVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
271 S.W.3d 634 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)