Lischinsky v. Hellinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lischinsky v. Hellinger

112 A.D. 894, 97 N.Y.S. 1140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D. 894 (Lischinsky v. Hellinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lischinsky v. Hellinger, 112 A.D. 894, 97 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

To- obviate any question as to the order herein being pleaded as a bar, it should he modified by adding a provision thereto that it is without [895]*895prejudice to such further action by petitioner as he may be advised, And as so modified it should be affirmed, without costs. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and'as modified affirmed, without costs. Order filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

To- obviate any question as to the order herein being pleaded as a bar, it should he modified by adding a provision thereto that it is without [895]*895prejudice to such further action by petitioner as he may be advised, And as so modified it should be affirmed, without costs. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and'as modified affirmed, without costs. Order filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D. 894, 97 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lischinsky-v-hellinger-nyappdiv-1906.