Lisanti v. Suffolk County Transportation

270 A.D.2d 270, 704 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2523

This text of 270 A.D.2d 270 (Lisanti v. Suffolk County Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lisanti v. Suffolk County Transportation, 270 A.D.2d 270, 704 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the County of Suffolk s/h/a Suffolk County Transportation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated April 1, 1999, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, there is no evidence that the respondent had actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Guiliano v Town of Oyster Bay, 244 AD2d 408, 409). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting the petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guiliano v. Town of Oyster Bay
244 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D.2d 270, 704 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisanti-v-suffolk-county-transportation-nyappdiv-2000.