Lisa Sepulveda v. Manuel Molina and Marcos Molina

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 22, 2021
Docket04-21-00385-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lisa Sepulveda v. Manuel Molina and Marcos Molina (Lisa Sepulveda v. Manuel Molina and Marcos Molina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lisa Sepulveda v. Manuel Molina and Marcos Molina, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 22, 2021

No. 04-21-00385-CV

Lisa SEPULVEDA, Appellant

v.

Manuel MOLINA and Marcus Molina, Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CI09823 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In the case underlying this appeal, the trial court signed a final judgment on June 11, 2021. The deadline to file a timely post-judgment motion was July 12, 2021. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a). When a post-judgment motion that may operate to extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal is not timely filed, an appellant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. An untimely post-judgment motion, e.g., a motion for new trial, does not extend the time to file a notice of appeal. See id.; In re Estate of Block, No. 04-11-00558-CV, 2011 WL 5115697, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Oct. 26, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“An untimely motion for new trial does not extend appellate deadlines). Here, Appellant’s motion for reconsideration, which we construe as a motion to modify, correct, or reform the judgment, see TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(c), was filed on August 18, 2021, thirty-seven days after the motion was due. It appears that the motion was not timely filed, and thus the deadline to file Appellant’s notice of appeal was not extended. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a); In re Estate of Block, 2011 WL 5115697, at *1. If so, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on July 12, 2021, and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on July 27, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on September 10, 2021. It appears to be untimely. We ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.”). If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lisa Sepulveda v. Manuel Molina and Marcos Molina, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisa-sepulveda-v-manuel-molina-and-marcos-molina-texapp-2021.