Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters

868 F.3d 311, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13550
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters. Read the opinion of the Court — 856 F.3d 402
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2017·No. 16-30929·Published

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The court having been polled ’ at' the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App, P, 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), en banc reconsideration of this case is DENIED. In the en banc poll, six judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen and Elrod) and eight judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, and Costa).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters, 868 F.3d 311, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13550 (5th Cir. 2017).

868 F.3d 311 (Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dearmore v. City of Garland
519 F.3d 517 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Terry Petteway v. Mark Henry
738 F.3d 132 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters
856 F.3d 402 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)