Lisa McCool, Terry L. Harper, and Nancy C. Rogers v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Operating, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 3, 2018·No. 02-17-00175-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00175-CV

LISA MCCOOL, TERRY L. APPELLANTS HARPER, AND NANCY C. ROGERS

V.

CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, APPELLEES L.L.C. AND CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC.

------------

FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 067-280543-15

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Vacate And Remand

Pursuant To Settlement.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be

granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. merits and remand this case to the trial court to render judgment in accordance

with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office

Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 3, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lisa McCool, Terry L. Harper, and Nancy C. Rogers v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Operating, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Lisa McCool, Terry L. Harper, and Nancy C. Rogers v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Operating, Inc. (Lisa McCool, Terry L. Harper, and Nancy C. Rogers v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Operating, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)