Lisa Hansen, DVM and Jason Hansen v. PetVet PC Manager, LLC and Quality Veterinary Services, P.C. F/K/A Al Veterinary Services, P.C. D/B/A Pfennig Lane Animal Hospital

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2025
Docket07-25-00015-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lisa Hansen, DVM and Jason Hansen v. PetVet PC Manager, LLC and Quality Veterinary Services, P.C. F/K/A Al Veterinary Services, P.C. D/B/A Pfennig Lane Animal Hospital (Lisa Hansen, DVM and Jason Hansen v. PetVet PC Manager, LLC and Quality Veterinary Services, P.C. F/K/A Al Veterinary Services, P.C. D/B/A Pfennig Lane Animal Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lisa Hansen, DVM and Jason Hansen v. PetVet PC Manager, LLC and Quality Veterinary Services, P.C. F/K/A Al Veterinary Services, P.C. D/B/A Pfennig Lane Animal Hospital, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-25-00015-CV

LISA HANSEN, DVM AND JASON HANSEN, APPELLANTS

V.

PETVET PC MANAGER, LLC AND QUALITY VETERINARY SERVICES, P.C. F/K/A AL VETERINARY SERVICES, P.C. D/B/A PFENNIG LANE ANIMAL HOSPITAL, APPELLEES

On Appeal from the 353rd District Court Travis County, Texas1 Trial Court No. D-1-GN-24-008680, Honorable Jessica Mangrum, Presiding

January 31, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellants, Lisa Hansen, DMV and Jason Hansen, appeal from the trial court’s

Second Agreed Order Modifying and Extending Temporary Restraining Order. Now

pending before this Court is Appellants’ unopposed motion seeking voluntary dismissal

of the appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party

from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court

has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the

motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment of costs,

costs will be taxed against Appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lisa Hansen, DVM and Jason Hansen v. PetVet PC Manager, LLC and Quality Veterinary Services, P.C. F/K/A Al Veterinary Services, P.C. D/B/A Pfennig Lane Animal Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisa-hansen-dvm-and-jason-hansen-v-petvet-pc-manager-llc-and-quality-texapp-2025.