Lisa Guffey v. Roslynn Mauskopf

• Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
• Decided: January 13, 2023
• Docket: 20-5183
• Status: Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Filed: January 13, 2023

No. 20-5183

LISA GUFFEY AND CHRISTINE SMITH, APPELLEES

v.

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, APPELLANT

Consolidated with 20-5208

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:18-cv-01271)

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge; HENDERSON**, MILLETT, PILLARD*, WILKINS, KATSAS, RAO, WALKER, CHILDS, and PAN, Circuit Judges 2

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

* Circuit Judge Pillard did not participate in this matter.

** Circuit Judge Henderson would grant the petition for rehearing en banc. A statement by Circuit Judge Henderson, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: For the reasons explained in my panel dissent, which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, Guffey v. Mauskopf, 45 F.4th 442, 452–62 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (Henderson, J., dissenting), I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc.