Lisa Barber v. Jo Anne Barnhart

73 F. App'x 903
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2003·No. 03-1762·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Barber appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal as untimely of her *904 complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that dismissal of the complaint was proper, because it was filed more than sixty days after her attorney received notice of the Commissioner’s final decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Bess v. Barnhart, 387 F.3d 988, 990 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (limitations period under § 405(g) is triggered by notice received by either claimant or claimant’s attorney, whichever occurs first).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District *904 of Arkansas, adopting the proposed findings and recommendations of the Honorable Heniy L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lisa Barber v. Jo Anne Barnhart, 73 F. App'x 903 (8th Cir. 2003).

73 F. App'x 903 (Lisa Barber v. Jo Anne Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related