Lisa Barber v. Jo Anne Barnhart
This text of 73 F. App'x 903 (Lisa Barber v. Jo Anne Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lisa Barber appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal as untimely of her *904 complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that dismissal of the complaint was proper, because it was filed more than sixty days after her attorney received notice of the Commissioner’s final decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Bess v. Barnhart, 387 F.3d 988, 990 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (limitations period under § 405(g) is triggered by notice received by either claimant or claimant’s attorney, whichever occurs first).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District *904 of Arkansas, adopting the proposed findings and recommendations of the Honorable Heniy L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F. App'x 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisa-barber-v-jo-anne-barnhart-ca8-2003.