Lira v. State

21 S.W.2d 506
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 6, 1929
DocketNo. 12702
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 S.W.2d 506 (Lira v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lira v. State, 21 S.W.2d 506 (Tex. 1929).

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

Offense, assault to murder; ■penalty, two-years in the penitentiary.

Officers were called to a Mexican house where a disturbance was in progress. Arriving there, they found appellant armed with a pistol.. Asked to give it up, he refused, pointed a gun at one of them, and threatened to kill him if he came closer. He was pursued by the officers. As he fled, he fired back at or towards an officer who was some 120 to 150 feet away at the time. He ran under a house a short distance away. Told to come out, he did so without any further attempt to use his gun, which was voluntarily left by him under the house. The Mexican testified for himself that he was recently from Old Mexico, that he was drunk at the time of the alleged offense, and ran because he was afraid of being arrested; that he did not shoot at the officers; that he shot his pistol to scare them; that he did not intend to kill any of them.

The appellant correctly insists the court erred in refusing to charge on simple and aggravated assault, since there was present under the facts an issue as to a lack of intent to kill and a shot fired -only to alarm. Cubine v. State, 44 Tex. Cr. R. 596, 73 S. W. 396; Miller v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 13 S. W.(2d) 865; Ivory v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 279, 87 S. W. 699; Pearce v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 643, 40 S. W. 806; Price v. State, 81 Tex. Cr. R. 208, 194 S. W. 827.

We deem it unnecessary to pass on other alleged errors. Some of appellant’s bills are so qualified as to show no error, and others present questions not likely to again arise.

Reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State
521 S.W.2d 621 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.W.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lira-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.