Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJuly 23, 2012

Docket2011-1508

StatusUnpublished

This text of Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc. (Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

LIQUIDNET HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PULSE TRADING, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2011-1508 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Case No. 07-CV-6886, Judge Shira Ann Scheindlin. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ROBERT R. GILMAN, Gilman Clark & Hunter LLC, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was THOMAS J. CLARK. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 23, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI