Liquidator of the Clinton & Port Hudson Railroad v. Whitaker
This text of 22 La. Ann. 209 (Liquidator of the Clinton & Port Hudson Railroad v. Whitaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, under a decree ordering him to collect the assets of the insolvent corporation as speedily as possible, is seeking to enforce a mortgage against the defendant for stock subscribed. The defendant pleads the prescription of ten years against the judgment ordering the liquidator to collect, etc.
We are of opinion that the judgment in the case of the Gas Light Company v. Haynes is not prescribed. The judgment directs the liquidator to discharge a duty attached to his office. It is not a money-judgment. See 21 An. 250; ib. 44, and Liquidator of Clinton and Port Hudson Railroad Company v. Samuel Lee, recently decided.
It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of the district court be annulled, that the plea of prescription be overruled, and that the case be remanded to the district court to be proceeded with according to law. It is further ordered that the appellee pay the costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 La. Ann. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liquidator-of-the-clinton-port-hudson-railroad-v-whitaker-la-1870.