Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Shuster Gormley Co.
This text of 64 Pa. Super. 74 (Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Shuster Gormley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
As stated by the court below, there is only one matter of fact in dispute between these parties, and that was fully and adequately submitted to the jury. The sheriffs interpleader acts were passed for the relief of that officer and other similar officers: Bain v. Funk, 61 Pa. 185; Necker v. Sedgwick, 36 Pa. Superior Ct. 593, and when the sheriff complies with their requirements he is relieved from liability: Book v. Sharpe, 189 Pa. 44; Morrison v. Nipple, 39 Pa. Superior Ct. 184.
The opinion filed overruling the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, and for a new trial furnishes a complete answer to the argument of the appellant.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 Pa. Super. 74, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liquid-carbonic-co-v-shuster-gormley-co-pasuperct-1916.