Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Shuster Gormley Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Shuster Gormley Co.

64 Pa. Super. 74, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 246

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 82·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Oklady, P. J.,

As stated by the court below, there is only one matter of fact in dispute between these parties, and that was fully and adequately submitted to the jury. The sheriffs interpleader acts were passed for the relief of that officer and other similar officers: Bain v. Funk, 61 Pa. 185; Necker v. Sedgwick, 36 Pa. Superior Ct. 593, and when the sheriff complies with their requirements he is relieved from liability: Book v. Sharpe, 189 Pa. 44; Morrison v. Nipple, 39 Pa. Superior Ct. 184.

The opinion filed overruling the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, and for a new trial furnishes a complete answer to the argument of the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oklady, P. J.,

As stated by the court below, there is only one matter of fact in dispute between these parties, and that was fully and adequately submitted to the jury. The sheriffs interpleader acts were passed for the relief of that officer and other similar officers: Bain v. Funk, 61 Pa. 185; Necker v. Sedgwick, 36 Pa. Superior Ct. 593, and when the sheriff complies with their requirements he is relieved from liability: Book v. Sharpe, 189 Pa. 44; Morrison v. Nipple, 39 Pa. Superior Ct. 184.

The opinion filed overruling the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, and for a new trial furnishes a complete answer to the argument of the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Shuster Gormley Co., 64 Pa. Super. 74, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 246 (Pa. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

64 Pa. Super. 74 (Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Shuster Gormley Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related