Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 2021
Docket13-72936
StatusUnpublished

This text of Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson (Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson, (9th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 19 2021 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIQIANG GU, No. 13-72936

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-957-069

v. ORDER ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

The panel has voted to grant Gu’s Petition for Panel Rehearing in light of

this Court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478

(9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th

Cir. 2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 64) in this case is vacated.

Gu’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is

remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether alternative

grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(I).

The Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED and the case is

REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. The Petition for Rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minto v. Jefferson Sessions
854 F.3d 619 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liqiang-gu-v-robert-wilkinson-ca9-2021.