Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson
This text of Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson (Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 19 2021 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LIQIANG GU, No. 13-72936
Petitioner, Agency No. A087-957-069
v. ORDER ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to grant Gu’s Petition for Panel Rehearing in light of
this Court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478
(9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th
Cir. 2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 64) in this case is vacated.
Gu’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is
remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether alternative
grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(I).
The Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED and the case is
REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. The Petition for Rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Liqiang Gu v. Robert Wilkinson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liqiang-gu-v-robert-wilkinson-ca9-2021.