Liptow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
This text of 731 N.W.2d 84 (Liptow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rebecca Jane LIPTOW, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jelinda Joanne Burnette-Liptow, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Michigan Department of Community Health, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
This Court should grant leave to appeal to consider whether MCL 600.5821(4) exempts a state governmental body from the one-year-back rule of MCL 500.3145(1). *85 This is a jurisprudentially significant issue of first impression.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
731 N.W.2d 84, 478 Mich. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liptow-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-ins-co-mich-2007.