Lipton v. Carmel Professional Office Park, Inc.
This text of 286 A.D.2d 332 (Lipton v. Carmel Professional Office Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law article 11 for judicial dissolution of a corporation, Carmel Professional Office Park, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated August 7, 2000, as, without a hearing, directed that $6,967.57 of the funds in the account of the temporary receiver be distributed to the petitioner.
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Putnam County, for a hearing on the appellant’s objections to the proposed distribution of these funds.
In light of the appellant’s objections to the proposed distribu[333]*333tion of $6,967.57 of the funds in the account of the temporary receiver to the respondent, the Supreme Court erred in directing the distribution of $6,967.57 to the respondent without first conducting a hearing (see, Business Corporation Law § 1216 [c]). Therefore, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Putnam County, for a hearing on the appellant’s objections. Ritter, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 332, 28 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipton-v-carmel-professional-office-park-inc-nyappdiv-2001.