Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co.

51 A.D.2d 527, 378 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10743

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 1976·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1975, denying petitioners’ application for a judgment staying respondent from proceeding to arbitration, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Petitioners’ contention that the transaction herein involved did not have its inception while they were associated with respondent A. T. Brod & Co. is properly to be determined by the arbitrators. (Cf. Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1975, denying petitioners’ application for a judgment staying respondent from proceeding to arbitration, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Petitioners’ contention that the transaction herein involved did not have its inception while they were associated with respondent A. T. Brod & Co. is properly to be determined by the arbitrators. (Cf. Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co., 51 A.D.2d 527, 378 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 527 (Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related