Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co.

Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co.

51 A.D.2d 527, 378 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 527 (Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipton v. A. T. Brod & Co., 51 A.D.2d 527, 378 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1975, denying petitioners’ application for a judgment staying respondent from proceeding to arbitration, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Petitioners’ contention that the transaction herein involved did not have its inception while they were associated with respondent A. T. Brod & Co. is properly to be determined by the arbitrators. (Cf. Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & Carp
298 N.E.2d 42 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 527, 378 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipton-v-a-t-brod-co-nyappdiv-1976.