Liptak v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Liptak v. State

278 So. 2d 677, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 1973

DocketNos. 71-650, 71-783

StatusPublished

This text of 278 So. 2d 677 (Liptak v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liptak v. State, 278 So. 2d 677, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8106 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on January 11, 1972 (256 So.2d 548) reversing the judgments of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

[678]*678Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 4, 1973 (277 So.2d 19) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause with directions to reinstate the judgment of the trial court:

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on February 2, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed January 11, 1972 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the judgments of the trial court appealed herein are reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R. 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI