Liptak v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control
131 A.2d 586, 24 N.J. 222
This text of 131 A.2d 586 (Liptak v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Liptak v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 131 A.2d 586, 24 N.J. 222 (N.J. 1957).
Opinion
ANNA LIPTAK, APPELLANT-PETITIONER,
v.
DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Charles Bertini for the petitioner.
Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., and Mr. Samuel B. Helfand for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 A.2d 586, 24 N.J. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liptak-v-division-of-alcoholic-beverage-control-nj-1957.