Lipske, David v. Adam's Wood Flooring, a/k/a Adam's Hardwood Flooring

2018 TN WC 141
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedSeptember 7, 2018
Docket2017-06-0419
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 141 (Lipske, David v. Adam's Wood Flooring, a/k/a Adam's Hardwood Flooring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipske, David v. Adam's Wood Flooring, a/k/a Adam's Hardwood Flooring, 2018 TN WC 141 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Sep 07, 2018 09:32 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

David Lipske, ) Docket No. 2017-06-0419 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 16280-2017 Adam's Wood Flooring, a/k/a Adam's ) Hardwood Flooring, ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Employer. ) )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED RELIEF

This case came before the Court on September 5 on David Lipske' s Request for Expedited Hearing. The threshold factual issue is whether Mr. Lipske was an employee of Adam's Hardwood Flooring when he suffered a work injury. For the reasons below, the Court holds that on the present record Mr. Lipske is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving that he was an employee of Adam's Hardwood Flooring. Therefore, at this time, he is not entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Lipske testified that Mike Shaw hired him to work for "Adam's Wood Flooring," a/k/a Adam's Hardwood Flooring. Adam Shaw represented to the Court that he is the owner of Adam's Hardwood Flooring, a sole proprietorship.' Mr. Lipske understood the owner of the business was Mr. Shaw or that possibly Mr. Shaw and Mike were business partners, although Mr. Lipske later testified that Mike said he [Mike] was working with Adam's Wood Flooring. Mr. Lipske believed the Shaws were brothers. Mr. Lipske acknowledged he never met Mr. Shaw in person and did not think they had ever spoken. Mr. Lipske said he completed an employment application bearing the name "Adam's Hardwood Flooring," which he gave to Mike. However, he did not present this document to the Court. 1 Because Adam and Mike Shaw have the same surnames, for clarity, the Court will refer to Adam Shaw as "Mr. Shaw" and Mike Shaw as "Mike" in this order.

1 Mr. Lipske alleged that, after just one day's work, he injured his hand while operating a table saw. He gave immediate notice of the injury to Mike. According to Mr. Lipske, "The conversation I had with Michael-! told him we wasn't going to report this. Just take care of my hospital bills and keep me working. He said, 'No problem."' However, a few days later, according to Mr. Lipske, Mike sent a text that said, "I hope you find a job so you can pay your bills." Mr. Lipske testified that he was paid in cash for the time he worked, but he did not say who paid him. Adam's Hardwood Flooring never offered a panel, paid for any treatment, or provided temporary disability benefits.

Mr. Lipske filed a Petition for Benefit Determination, which launched an investigation by the Bureau's Compliance Unit, culminating with a written report. The report documented that the investigator spoke with Mr. Shaw, an Ohio resident, who "confirmed employment for Mr. Lipske and that the injury did occur as reported." Mr. Shaw clarified at the hearing that he meant he confirmed Mr. Lipske's employment "with Michael Shaw." Mr. Shaw said he did not know why Mike represented to Mr. Lipske that Mike was working for Adam's Hardwood Flooring.

Mr. Shaw testified that Mike is not his brother but a second cousin. Mike worked for Adam's Hardwood Flooring in Ohio for approximately four years before moving to Tennessee. Mr. Shaw said his second cousin attempted to start his own hardwood flooring business in the new location, forming Wolf Works LLC in 2016 and registering it in the name of "Michael Kirk Shaw" with the Tennessee Secretary of State's Office. Mr. Shaw acknowledged lending equipment to help with the new business.

Mr. Shaw further stated that he had no knowledge of Mike hiring Mr. Lipske. Mr. Shaw acknowledged that, after Mr. Lipske's accident, Mr. Shaw's attorney made a settlement offer to Mr. Lipske's counsel. Mr. Shaw said he did so because Mike was "scared," and "I was helping my cousin out."

Neither party subpoenaed Mike to testify at the hearing.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an expedited hearing, Mr. Lipske must present sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015); Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2017).

Specifically, Mr. Lipske must show he was Mr. Shaw's employee. The Tennessee Workers' Compensation law defines "employee" as "every person ... under any contract of hire or apprenticeship, written or implied." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-1 02(12)(A). "In order for one to be an employee of another for purposes of our Workers' Compensation

2 Law, it is, therefore, required that there be an express or implied agreement for the alleged employer to remunerate the alleged employee for his services in behalf of the former." Black v. Dance, 643 S.W.2d 654, 657 (Tenn. 1982). Mr. Lipske, as the employee, has the burden of proof on all essential elements of his workers' compensation claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 20 15). This includes the burden of proving that he was employed by Adam's Hardwood Flooring.

Mr. Lipske credibly testified that Mike hired him, representing that Mr. Lipske would be an employee of Adam's Hardwood Flooring. Mr. Lipske stated that he was paid for his work before the injury, but he did not say who paid him. Under Black, this is a critical consideration; if Mike paid him, this suggests he was Mike's employee.

Mr. Shaw was also a credible witness. He testified that around the date of alleged injury, Mike was starting his own hardwood flooring business in Tennessee. The filing information for Wolf Works LLC bearing the name Michael Kirk Shaw backs this assertion. Mr. Shaw testified that he had no knowledge of Mike hiring Mr. Lipske before the accident. Further, the Court does not construe the settlement offer by Mr. Shaw's attorney as an admission that he employed Mr. Lipske. These facts are not the only lack of proof.

Notably absent from the hearing was Mike, whose testimony would shed light on what he said when Mr. Lipske was hired. Without it, on the present record, the Court is unable to hold that Mr. Lipske carried his burden of showing he would likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving he was an employee of Adam's Hardwood Flooring on the date of injury.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Lipske's requested relief is denied at this time.

2. This case is set for a scheduling hearing on November 5, 2018, at 2:30 p.m. Central Time. The parties must call (615) 532-9552 or (toll-free) (866) 943-0025 to participate. Failure to appear by telephone may result in a determination of the issues without your further participation.

ENTERED September 7, 2018.

3 Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Dance
643 S.W.2d 654 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipske-david-v-adams-wood-flooring-aka-adams-hardwood-flooring-tennworkcompcl-2018.