Lipshaw v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lipshaw v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland

681 So. 2d 757, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9243, 1996 WL 492161

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 1996

DocketNo. 95-05166

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 681 So. 2d 757 (Lipshaw v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lipshaw v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland, 681 So. 2d 757, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9243, 1996 WL 492161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

Ralph I. Lipshaw, as Trustee of the Lake-land Yogi Land Trust, appeals the final judgment entered against him in a foreclosure action filed by Peoples Bank of Lakeland. We affirm because the final judgment was properly entered pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement between the parties. See 15A Am. Jur.2d Compromise and Settlement § 37 (1976); Cf. J. Allen, Inc. v. Castle Floor Covering, Inc., 543 So.2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (holding that, where parties compromise and settle a contract dispute, the rights and liabilities of the parties set forth in the settlement replace those of the original contract). However, the trial court’s reservation of jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment is not supported by the terms of the settlement agreement and, therefore, that portion of the final judgment is stricken. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

THREADGILL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

Ralph I. Lipshaw, as Trustee of the Lake-land Yogi Land Trust, appeals the final judgment entered against him in a foreclosure action filed by Peoples Bank of Lakeland. We affirm because the final judgment was properly entered pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement between the parties. See 15A Am. Jur.2d Compromise and Settlement § 37 (1976); Cf. J. Allen, Inc. v. Castle Floor Covering, Inc., 543 So.2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (holding that, where parties compromise and settle a contract dispute, the rights and liabilities of the parties set forth in the settlement replace those of the original contract). However, the trial court’s reservation of jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment is not supported by the terms of the settlement agreement and, therefore, that portion of the final judgment is stricken. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

THREADGILL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

681 So. 2d 757, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9243, 1996 WL 492161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipshaw-v-peoples-bank-of-lakeland-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack