Lipscomb v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

223 Md. 640
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 5, 1960·No. P. C. No. 62·Published

Opinion

PER Curiam.

For the reasons for denying relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act stated in Judge Evans’ comprehensive opinion in the trial court, and on the findings of fact therein set forth made after a full hearing, the application for leave to appeal is denied.

We may supplement Judge Evans’ opinion to the extent of noting that if there was any misunderstanding between the applicant and his trial counsel with regard to his taking an appeal, that of itself is not sufficient to warrant a belated appeal without a showing that he made such a complaint to the trial court or expressed dissatisfaction with the services of his lawyer. Canter v. Warden, 211 Md. 643, 127 A. 2d 139; Bowen v. Warden, 200 Md. 661, 90 A. 2d 174; Obenstine v. Warden, 198 Md. 648, 80 A. 2d 610. Cf. United States v. Robinson, 361 U. S. 220, 80 S. Ct. 282.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipscomb v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 223 Md. 640 (Md. 1960).

223 Md. 640 (Lipscomb v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Bowen v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
90 A.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Canter v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
127 A.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1956)
Obenstine v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
80 A.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1951)