Lipscomb v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

223 Md. 640
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 5, 1960
DocketP. C. No. 62
StatusPublished

This text of 223 Md. 640 (Lipscomb v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipscomb v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 223 Md. 640 (Md. 1960).

Opinion

PER Curiam.

For the reasons for denying relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act stated in Judge Evans’ comprehensive opinion in the trial court, and on the findings of fact therein set forth made after a full hearing, the application for leave to appeal is denied.

We may supplement Judge Evans’ opinion to the extent of noting that if there was any misunderstanding between the applicant and his trial counsel with regard to his taking an appeal, that of itself is not sufficient to warrant a belated appeal without a showing that he made such a complaint to the trial court or expressed dissatisfaction with the services of his lawyer. Canter v. Warden, 211 Md. 643, 127 A. 2d 139; Bowen v. Warden, 200 Md. 661, 90 A. 2d 174; Obenstine v. Warden, 198 Md. 648, 80 A. 2d 610. Cf. United States v. Robinson, 361 U. S. 220, 80 S. Ct. 282.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Bowen v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
90 A.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Canter v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
127 A.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1956)
Obenstine v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
80 A.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 Md. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipscomb-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1960.