Lipscomb v. Simmons

907 F.2d 114, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11843
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 1990
Docket87-4079
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 907 F.2d 114 (Lipscomb v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipscomb v. Simmons, 907 F.2d 114, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11843 (9th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

907 F.2d 114

Sheri LIPSCOMB, By and Through her next friend, Carolyn
DEFEHR; Autumn Scalf, & William Scalf, By and Through their
next friend Gloria Self, on Behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Dan SIMMONS, individually and in his official capacity as
Acting Director, Department of Human Resources of the State
of Oregon; & Jess Armas, individually and in his official
capacity as Acting Assistant Director, Department of Human
Resources of the State of Oregon and Acting Administrator,
Children's Services Division, Department of Human Resources
of the State of Oregon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-4079.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 10, 1990.

Prior report: 884 F.2d 1242.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Tucker
174 B.R. 732 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 F.2d 114, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipscomb-v-simmons-ca9-1990.