Lipscomb v. Lipscomb

660 So. 2d 991, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 130, 1995 WL 97445
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 10, 1995
DocketAV92000273
StatusPublished

This text of 660 So. 2d 991 (Lipscomb v. Lipscomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipscomb v. Lipscomb, 660 So. 2d 991, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 130, 1995 WL 97445 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Lipscomb, 660 So.2d 986 (Ala.1994). On remand to this court and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THIGPEN, YATES, MONROE and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Lipscomb
660 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 So. 2d 991, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 130, 1995 WL 97445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipscomb-v-lipscomb-alacivapp-1995.