Lipscomb v. Lipscomb

660 So. 2d 991, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 130, 1995 WL 97445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lipscomb v. Lipscomb. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 474
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 10, 1995·No. AV92000273·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Lipscomb, 660 So.2d 986 (Ala.1994). On remand to this court and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THIGPEN, YATES, MONROE and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipscomb v. Lipscomb, 660 So. 2d 991, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 130, 1995 WL 97445 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

660 So. 2d 991 (Lipscomb v. Lipscomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Lipscomb
660 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1994)