Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Lipscomb v. Atkinson & Jolly

Lipscomb v. Atkinson & Jolly

142 S.E. 311, 38 Ga. App. 3, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 3
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1928
Docket18344, 18345
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 311 (Lipscomb v. Atkinson & Jolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipscomb v. Atkinson & Jolly, 142 S.E. 311, 38 Ga. App. 3, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 3 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

In eacli of these eases the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the motion for a new trial 'show cause ■ for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgments affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Tjulce, J., eoneur. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiffs. Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 311, 38 Ga. App. 3, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipscomb-v-atkinson-jolly-gactapp-1928.