Lipps v. Donaldson
This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 600 (Lipps v. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion of Mr. Charles Cotesworth Pinckney Solicitor for the Complainant suggesting that the Defendant Donaldson had stood out on Process of Contempt to a Commission of Rebellion for want of his answer to the Plaintiffs Bill as might appear by the same under the great Seal of the Province and the Commissioners Certificate thereon indorsed whereby they did certify that the said Defendant was not to be found Ordered that the Serjeant at Arms 17 attending this Court do apprehend the said Defendant and bring him to the Barr of this Court to answer the said Contempt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipps-v-donaldson-ctchansc-1772.