Lippman v. Gottesman

66 Misc. 165, 121 N.Y.S. 325
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 66 Misc. 165 (Lippman v. Gottesman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lippman v. Gottesman, 66 Misc. 165, 121 N.Y.S. 325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant had given a continuing guaranty of the price of goods to be sold to his brother-in-law, one Mandell, by the plaintiff, on credit of sixty days. From March 7, 1907, to December 3, 1908, plaintiff sold various goods to Mandell, who neglected to pay at the end of the term of credit. In some instances notes were taken from him which operated as an extension of the credit and discharged the guarantor as to the amounts covered thereby. The indebtedness now sued for is for goods sold on sixty days’ credit after December 3, 1908, and as to which there has been no extension of time. Defendant contends that the 'guaranty was terminated altogether by the prior extensions. We consider ourselves bound by Klein v. Long, 27 App. Div. 158, to hold to the contrary, and affirm the judgment.

Present: Seabury, Guy and Whitney) JJ.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klein v. Long
27 A.D. 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Misc. 165, 121 N.Y.S. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lippman-v-gottesman-nyappterm-1910.