Lippincott v. Tanner

1 Miles 286

This text of 1 Miles 286 (Lippincott v. Tanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lippincott v. Tanner, 1 Miles 286 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1836).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A writ of venditioni exponas must be grounded upon a previous writ of fieri facias, issued upon the same judgment: both writs in fact constitute but one execution of the judgment. The fieri facias is necessary to authorize the seizure of lands; the ven-ditioni exponas to authorize the sale of them. In M’Cormick v. Meason, the judgment creditors who sold the lands had previously levied them by writs of fieri facias issued on their respective judgments. The venditioni exponas in this case was irregular, and the rule should have been taken to quash it and all proceedings had under it. But as the defendant asks only that the sale should be set aside, let it be done; but the plaintiff will understand that no effectual sale can be made upon this writ.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Miles 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lippincott-v-tanner-pactcomplphilad-1836.