Lippert v. Engle
369 N.E.2d 1044, 52 Ohio St. 2d 67, 6 Ohio Op. 3d 234, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 459
Opinion
Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 130.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lippert v. Engle, 369 N.E.2d 1044, 52 Ohio St. 2d 67, 6 Ohio Op. 3d 234, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 459 (Ohio 1977).
369 N.E.2d 1044 (Lippert v. Engle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State, Afjeh v. Village of Ottawa Hills, Unpublished Decision (4-16-2004)
2004 Ohio 1968 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Bryco Company v. City of Milford, Unpublished Decision (6-25-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
State v. Board of Commisioners, Warren Cty., Unpublished Decision (8-3-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998
State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle
451 N.E.2d 225 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)