Lippert v. Engle

369 N.E.2d 1044, 52 Ohio St. 2d 67, 6 Ohio Op. 3d 234, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 459
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1977·No. No. 77-634·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 130.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lippert v. Engle, 369 N.E.2d 1044, 52 Ohio St. 2d 67, 6 Ohio Op. 3d 234, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 459 (Ohio 1977).

369 N.E.2d 1044 (Lippert v. Engle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related