Lippens v. Winkler Backereitechnik GmbH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lippens v. Winkler Backereitechnik GmbH

138 A.D.3d 1507, 29 N.Y.S.3d 223

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2016

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 138 A.D.3d 1507 (Lippens v. Winkler Backereitechnik GmbH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lippens v. Winkler Backereitechnik GmbH, 138 A.D.3d 1507, 29 N.Y.S.3d 223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered June 16, 2014 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied in part the motions of defendants Bakery Engineering/Winkler, Inc., Winkler Backereitechnik GmbH and Werner & Pfleiderer Industrielle Backtechnik GmbH seeking summary judgment and granted the cross motion of plaintiff for leave to serve an amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Sutton Inv. Corp. v City of Syracuse, 12 AD3d 1201 [2004]).

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered June 16, 2014 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied in part the motions of defendants Bakery Engineering/Winkler, Inc., Winkler Backereitechnik GmbH and Werner & Pfleiderer Industrielle Backtechnik GmbH seeking summary judgment and granted the cross motion of plaintiff for leave to serve an amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Sutton Inv. Corp. v City of Syracuse, 12 AD3d 1201 [2004]).

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.3d 1507, 29 N.Y.S.3d 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lippens-v-winkler-backereitechnik-gmbh-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack